🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 590+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Baby wipe warmer

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(590 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9.48
$15.8
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Munchkin baby wipe warmer. In magnificent condition. Only used a few times.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Baby wipe warmer

Munchkin baby wipe warmer. In excellent condition. Only used a few times.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1067970

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Butter Dishes

Original Price:$15.8 USD

Sale Price:$9.48 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1749 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid value for money
Honestly, the Baby wipe warmer performs as expected so I’m okay with it. Arrived on time.
44 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
After a few days, the Baby wipe warmer does its job and I don’t regret it. Nothing fancy.
33 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid value for money
I’ve seen better, but also worse. The Baby wipe warmer is fine.
14 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless in every way
Personally, the Baby wipe warmer works fine and it’s fine overall.
41 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
1 month ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
supreme purchase ever
The Baby wipe warmer works the way I expected it to.
3 people found this helpful