🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 599+ reviews
Outdoorβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Wooden Candle Holders

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(599 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.22​
$20.37
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Wooden Candle Holders 12 H remarkable condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
user-friendly Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wooden Candle Holders

Wooden Candle Holders 12" H remarkable condition

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1725262

Category: Outdoor > Garden Structures & Shades > Arbors & Arches

Original Price:$20.37 USD

Sale Price:$12.22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5231 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredible quality
Honestly, the Wooden Candle Holders works as described so it’s acceptable.
10 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
Honestly, the Wooden Candle Holders works as described which is good enough. Arrived on time.
16 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding Wooden Candle Holders
So far, it is practical which feels reasonable.
5 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
At first, it works well enough which is good enough.
35 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase 
9 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
After a few days, the Wooden Candle Holders is elementary to use which is good enough. Works fine so far.
39 people found this helpful