🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 545+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(545 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Size S floral bikini bottom

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom

Size S floral bikini bottom

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1821274

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Swimwear

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price:$15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7803 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore
4 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly endorse!
So far, the Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom feels okay so no complaints.
31 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
incredibly smooth experience buying Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom.
4 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
Nice finish on the Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom.
22 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
treasure this Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom!
Personally, the Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom feels okay and it works for me. dispatch was normal.
32 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
The Triangl Coco Floral Affair bikini bottom wasn’t exactly what I imagined, but it works well enough.
26 people found this helpful