🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 561+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(561 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$66.17
$110.28
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

SteiffOkapi

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

Steiff
Okapi

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1913240

Category: Toys > Stuffed Animals & Plush > Stuffed Animals

Original Price:$110.28 USD

Sale Price:$66.17 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8339 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
foremost purchase ever​
To be fair, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is practical to use so no complaints.
41 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage
The Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage feels stable.
44 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
After a few days, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Packaging was easy.
9 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
highly pleased
Quality is decent for the price. Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is fine.
35 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
So far, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is basic to use which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful