🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 181+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Duratrax C2 Six Pack MT RC Tires

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(181 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$36
$60
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

favor newly-released tires Slightly used but still look good

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Duratrax C2 Six Pack MT RC Tires

enjoy newly-released tires
Slightly used but still look good

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1948374

Category: Toys > Remote Control Toys & Vehicles > Remote Control Vehicles & Animals

Original Price:$60 USD

Sale Price:$36 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6619 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely happy
Nothing unusual to report about the Duratrax C2 Six Pack MT RC Tires.
14 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Chicago, IL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
So far, the Duratrax C2 Six Pack MT RC Tires is hassle-at no charge to use and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
34 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
I’m okay with it.
40 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
To be fair, it performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
45 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
At first, the Duratrax C2 Six Pack MT RC Tires is effortless to use so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful