🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 714+ reviews
Fashion✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller 

JC Penny Home 1980 Electric Blanket 62" X 82" Twin Blanket

★★★★★4.1 out of 5(714 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$72.2​
$120.33
Sale
✓ on the house dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

JC Penny Home 1980 Electric Blanket 62 X 82 Twin Blanket

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

📋 Product Description

JC Penny Home 1980 Electric Blanket 62" X 82" Twin Blanket

JC Penny Home 1980 Electric Blanket 62" X 82" Twin Blanket

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Fashion products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 35987016

Category: Fashion > Products >

Original Price:$120.33 USD

Sale Price:$72.2 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.1
★★★★★
Based on 9487 reviews
HR
Heather Robinson
10 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Highly endorse!
I would get this again! It's lightweight yet tough. Will buy again!
13 people found this helpful
MM
Mary Mitchell ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Columbus, OH
★★★★★
Couldn't be happier
really pleased with this purchase. It's sturdy and well-constructed. Five stars every the way!
46 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Jones ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Detroit, MI
★★★★★
Couldn't be happier
Impressed from the start. The functionality is top-notch. Worth every cent.
35 people found this helpful
JJ
Jacob Jackson ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Los Angeles, CA
★★★★★
Impressed!
Impressed from the start. I secure compliments on it all the time. extremely impressed overall.
13 people found this helpful
SG
Sarah Gonzalez ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Houston, TX
★★★★☆
appreciate it!
wonderful quality for the price. The finish is smooth and professional. Truly magnificent.
10 people found this helpful